1. SFT
  2. Archiwum
  3. Vol. 63
  4. Mechanisms for Data Acquisition to Tr...

Mechanisms for Data Acquisition to Train Artificial Intelligence Models for Detecting Increased Susceptibility to Fire Situations by Using Internet of Things Devices and Satellite Systems

Dawid, Jurczyński, M.Sc. Eng. , Paweł, Buchwald, Ph.D. Eng.

Download article
Open Access
DOI: 10.12845/sft.63.1.2024.3, pages: 34 – 43

Abstract

Aim: Exploration and developing mechanisms of advanced data acquisition necessary for training an artificial intelligence model capable of effectively detecting areas with increased susceptibility to fire situations. The study focuses on utilizing data from satellite missions and ground-based sensors, which provide both high-resolution imagery and precise data on temperature, humidity, and other environmental factors. By analysing these diverse data sources, the research aims to create a comprehensive and efficient model capable of early detection of potential fire hazards, which is crucial for prevention for fire-prone situations.

Project and methods: It centres on a project that aims to enhance fire detection and management through the integration of artificial intelligence with data acquired from satellite systems and internet of things devices. The methodologies employed in this project involve a combination of advanced data acquisition, machine learning techniques, and the synthesis of diverse environmental data to train artificial intelligence models that can predict and detect fire incidents more effectively.

Results: Significant advancements in fire detection and management have been demonstrated through the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with satellite data and IoT: 1. Enhanced monitoring capabilities the use of satellite data systems enabled real-time monitoring of thermal anomalies and vegetation health, crucial for early detection and effective monitoring of wildfires. This real-time capability allowed for quicker responses and more informed decision-making in firefighting efforts. 2. Effective integration of data sources: the integration of satellite and surface data proved to be effective in enhancing the predictive capabilities of the fire management systems. This comprehensive approach allowed for a better understanding of fire dynamics and contributed to more accurate and timely predictions.

Conclusions: It could be emphasize the significant benefits and future potential of integrating artificial intelligence with satellite and internet of things data for improving fire detection and management. The integration of satellite imagery and internet of things sensor data is essential for enhancing the predictive accuracy of artificial intelligence systems. This integration allows for a comprehensive assessment of fire risks, providing actionable intelligence that is critical for prevention for fire-prone situations. These conclusions underscore the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in enhancing fire management systems.

Keywords: data acquisition, artificial intelligence, IoT, satellite data systems, fire management systems

Type of article: original scientific article

Bibliography:

  1. Giglio L., Schroeder W., Justice Ch.O., The Collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products, “Remote Sensing of Environment” 2016, 178, 31–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.054.
  2. Schroeder W., Prins E., Giglio L., Csiszar I., Schmidt Ch., Morisette J., Morton D., Validation of GOES and MODIS active fire detection products using ASTER and ETM+ data, “Remote Sensing of Environment” 2008, 112(5), 2711–2726, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.01.005.
  3. Justice C.O., Giglio L., Korontzi S., et al., The MODIS fire products, “Remote Sensing of Environment” 2002, 83, 1–2, 244–262, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00076-7.
  4. Jurczyński D., Grzebień K., Estimating the possibility of a fire using satellite missions, “Security Forum” 2023, 7, 1, 163–177, https://doi.org/10.26410/SF_1/23/12.
  5. Maffei C., Alfieri S., Menenti M., Time series of land surface temperature from daily MODIS measurements for the prediction of fire hazard, in: Advances in forest fire research, X.V. Domingos (ed.), 1024-1029, https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0884-6_111.
  6. Chuvieco E., Lizundia-Loiola J., Pettinari M.L. et al., Generation and analysis of a new global burned area product based on MODIS 250 m reflectance bands and thermal anomalies, “Earth Syst. Sci. Data” 2018, 10, 2015–2031, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2015-2018.
  7. Freeborn P.H., Wooster M.J., Roberts G., Xu W., Evaluating the SEVIRI Fire Thermal Anomaly Detection Algorithm across the Central African Republic Using the MODIS Active Fire Product, “Remote Sens.” 2014, 6, 1890–1917, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6031890.
  8. Maffei C., Alfieri S.M., Menenti M., Relating Spatiotemporal Patterns of Forest Fires Burned Area and Duration to DiurnalLand Surface Temperature Anomalies, “Remote Sens.” 2018, 10, 1777, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111777.
  9. Schroeder W., Oliva P., Giglio L., Csiszar I.A., The New VIIRS 375m active fire detection data product: Algorithm description and initial assessment, “Remote Sensing of Environment” 2014, 143, 85–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.008.
  10. Zhang X., Kondragunta S., Ram J., Schmidt C., Huang H.C., Near-real-time global biomass burning emissions product from geostationary satellite constellation, “Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres” 2017, 117(D14), 122, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017459.
  11. Setzer A.W., Pereira M.C., Amazonia biomass burning in 1987 and an estimate of their tropospheric emissions,“Ambio” 2013, 22(1), 37–42.
  12. Schmetz J., Pili P., Tjemkes S., Just D., Kerkmann J., Rota S., Ratier A., An Introduction to Meteosat Second Generation (MSG), “Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society” 2002, 83(7), 977–992.
  13. Menzel W.P., Purdom J.F.W., Introducing GOES-I: The first of a new generation of Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites, "Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society” 1994, 75(5), 757–781, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<0757:IGITFO>2.0.CO;2.
  14. Kidwell K.B., Global Vegetation Index user's guide, NOAA Technical Report NESDIS, 1991, 107.
  15. Kaufman Y.J., Justice C.O. et al., The MODIS fire products, “Remote Sensing of Environment” 2002, 83 (1–3), 244–262, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00076-7.
  16. Stöckli R., Vermote E., The operational land imager: Remote sensing of forest cover and biophysical trends, “Remote Sensing of Environment” 2006, 100(1), 75–89.
  17. Roy D.P., Lewis P.E., Justice C.O., Burned area mapping using multi-temporal moderate spatial resolution data—a bi-directional reflectance model-based expectation approach, “Remote Sensing of Environment” 2002, 81(1–2), 263–286, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00077-9.
  18. Miller J.D., Thode A.E., Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR), “Remote Sensing of Environment” 2007, 109(4), 66–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.12.006.
  19. Pacheco A.P.S., Fernandes K., Chaves M.E., Assessment of fire severity and land cover change in a Mediterranean landscape using remote sensing and GIS, “Remote Sensing of Environment” 2015, 156, 460–473.
  20. Buchwald P., Wykorzystanie systemów teleinformatycznych i pomiarowych do dystrybucji danych na potrzeby prognozowania infekcji roślin uprawnych, w: Wybrane Aspekty Informatyki Biomedycznej, P. Kostwa (red.), Wydawnictwo WSB, Dąbrowa Górnicza 2014.
  21. Buchwald P., Granosik G., Gwiazda A., Internet Rzeczy i jego przemysłowe zastosowania, Wydawnictwo PWE, Warszawa 2022.
  22. Naderpour M., Rizeei H.M., Ramezani F., Forest Fire Risk Prediction: A Spatial Deep Neural Network-Based Framework,“Remote Sensing of Environment” 2021, 13, 2513. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132513.
  23. You X., Zheng Z., Yang K., Yu L., Liu J., Chen J., Lu X., Guo S., A PSO-CNN-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Forest Fire Risk on a National Scale, “Forests” 2024, 15, 86, https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010086.
  24. Chukalin A.V., Kovalnogov V.N., Fedorov R.V., Chamchiyan Y.E, Kornilova, M.I., Verification of the Digital Twin of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer in the Area of the Wind Farm Based on Telemetry Data and Meteorological Measurements, “IJIRMPS” 2023, https://doi.org/10.37082/IJIRMPS. ICTIMESH-23.13.
  25. Guo N., Liu J., Di K. et al., A hybrid attention model based on first-order statistical features for smoke recognition, “Science China Technological Sciences” 2024, 67, 809–822, https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2449-1.